|
Jul 28
2009
|
Cost per Lead - Cost per Rental Application - Cost per Lease
Posted by: Sergio Navarrete on Jul 28, 2009 01:00 |
Name Your Price!
I tried posting this as a discussion as well, but I would like to reach a broader audience.
This question is for all multi-unit leasing agents, property managers, apartment operators and apartment owners.
If you were to think of a price per pre-qualified lead, per pre-qualified rental application, and price per lease that would be acceptable. A price for each of these that would allow you to make the decision on the spot.
NOTE- Pre-qualified = a potential renter interested in YOUR apartment.
Here is an example:
- Price per tenant lead: $20.00
- Price per rental application: $50.00
- Price per lease: $100.00
What is a price for each one of these that would make you say: "That is a great deal! I will take it!"
Thank you all for your input,
Apartment Marketing, Tenant Leads, Rental Applications
Sergio Navarrete

I have a client who is paying $200 per lead and is happy. They close at any average of 45% (these are qualified leads).
@Sergio I use Rent.com as the benchmark and work all the other numbers around that model. $389 per lease is the maximum I want to pay whether it be leads that get me to the lease or applicants. A $100 cost per lease model sounds very low, but would be very attractive to me. I don't think anyone will care for the applicant model, but who knows. I don't care for the lead model as it's even more challenging to monitor than the per lease model. With that model there needs to be a maximum or cap to the potential expense for many to take on a lead model.
The cost-per-lead or cost-per-application seems foreign to the multifamily industry.
What if our marketing brings in 10 eager, qualified apartment hunters walking through your leasing center but your model stinks like cheese and your rents are outrageous. Or, even worse, your short-staffed and have one brand new leasing agent trying to field 3 walk-ins at the same time.
In this situation, with a pay-per-move-in model, the marketer gets nothing.
---
The pay-per-lead model is ambiguous. What's a "lead" - a walk-in? A phone call? An email? To what degree are they qualified?
We have a few clients who pay $25 per walk-in lead plus a nominal charge - about $200 per week. This price point works okay, but there is still a grey area on what a "lead" is. Is a walk-in lead someone who walks in, takes a brochure and leaves?
--
We've been flirting with a $125 per application charge - whether the applicant is approved or not. Once again, this has a $200 per week base fee as well.
We would track applications through a incentive (similar to rent.com) and have the applicant report their leases directly to us. I'd love to get some feedback on this pay-per-application pricing structure!
I agree. I am encouraging them to pursue other avenues.
Sergio,
I think that $200 as a cost per lease is reasonable. An advertsing model that delivers pre-qualified leads is a good one. The correlation between lead and lease is a critical calculation to evaluate the advertsing source. Some sources consistently deliver qualified leads that convert at a higher ratio. Leasing commissions should be figured in as part of the cost of a leads and a lease,(if you pay commisions).
I consider application fees part of the cost of operations and agree that they should be separate.
Kim






"price per lease" is a head in the bed? do you collect fees after move-in?
"price per application" is an approved application? what if applicant fails criminal, poor rental history, etc....do you still charge?