|
Jan 27
2009
|
![]()
Well, there are some companies (one in particular) that may not appreciate this post, but they are getting an unfair share of our marketing dollars in my opinion. Here's my tip of the day to help you reduce the number of "I just want my $100 so I'm going to say I heard about you on Blah.com" people.
Don't ask them "How did you hear about us?" Ask, "Have you been here before?" You will be amazed at how many people will say, "yes," or tell you they've driven by before. You can then ask a follow-up question like, "Did you research us online, or find information about the community anywhere?" This way, source one = referral or drive-by, source two = whatever.com or guide.
Even if a prospect has heard about or driven by a property before, many are aware of the $100 fees for using Blah.com. According to the policies, you don't have to pay a fee if their primary source is a referral or drive by.
Enjoy your day!
Mj

And, as I am a decision maker in these instances I have often been perceived by the customer as being unfair by citing other sources that may have been mentioned. So, I am no longer willing to present any negative outcome to those that seek the payout from the site. These days, I pay up knowing there is a maximum of the referrals we have to pay (by the way I rarely pay the max on a 535 unit bldg). And, the customer is happy. Maybe every know and then blah.com will have to take the hit!
Renters often use many sources, we know its rarely just one in the decision making process. Of course they would like to take advantage of receiving $100 and would cite that source over others. Its human nature. As a property manager you don't want to start the relationship by denying them the $. Yet it may cost you less to offer a similar deal directly to help get the honest source.




