|
Apr 24
2009
|
I like to watch Keith Olbermann, especially his "Worst Persons in the World" segment. Usually, the worst person in the world is a public figure who said something stupid, or offensive. On April 24th's episode, I was surprised to see that multi-family made the list. A Property Manager was named the "Worst Person in the World" for following company policy. See link below for the whole story.
News Story:
http://www.620wtmj.com/news/local/43602282.html
Keith Olbermann Segment
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#30395503
Besides the fact that a Property Manager was named worst person in the world, which is not good attention for the property or management company involved in this story, but by default Multi-Family policy and procedure was also named worst person in the world.
In reading the story to try to understand what this manager did to be named on a national broadcast as the worst person in the world, I found that this manager was following policy per the company's lease agreement. I've worked for several management companies and I have a theory that one policy and procedure manual was written 30 years ago and was distributed to all the PM companies in the world to use. P and P manuals are full of the same stuff and if you've read one you've read them all. So I can totally understand how this scenario happened.
My point is this could have happened to any management company. The scenario that caused the "Worst Person" attention does happen a lot in property management, as far as breaking the lease goes. So, how could this have been avoided? It all comes down to consistent application of policy and procedure with a little common sense. All policy and procedure includes a bit of wiggle room. In my company's case we have the phrase "consult your regional manager" and in some cases discretion and sensitivity should be applied to special circumstances.
I have to say in this case the property management company had every right to act as they did per the signed lease agreement, but could they have handled the situation better? For now, I am sitting amazed as my industry on April 24th is "The worst Person in the World"...good grief.

I have to agree with Lisa. The property manager deserves her award along with her company. I wonder if they consider $2060 worth this publicity? I also wonder how the community residents feel about their community now?
I once witnessed a community 'come together' when a resident passed away. The property manager assisted the family by continuing the lease rent-free for a couple of months. This provided more than goodwill, it created a long-term resident that continued to live at the community for several years.
It would be wise for other property managers and management companies to evaluate their policies on this topic and make adjustments as needed.
E@






Otherwise, I cannot even begin to fathom why she would take this route. I'm sorry....but when the resident expires before the lease, and especially under such completely horrific conditions, I think the management company here should have expected a black eye for this one.
There are always exceptions to the rule and I would hope that this company now realizes this. This is the perfect example of how there definitely IS such a thing as bad publicity.
I'll be interested to see how this plays out in the media.