|
Apr 12
2011
|
How many of us "think owner" on a daily basis? Recently, I was sitting in my best friend's living room debating one of the many issues that are plaguing our current times and the subject turned to just this, "thinking owner". Now, I should mention that in this living room sat my best friend who is an accountant and a partner in her father's accounting firm as well as a partner in her husband's construction business. Also, in this room was an co-owner of a successful family run auto care business. As I listened to them, both of them touched on a topic that I think so many in this business overlook and that is when we go to work every day we represent, not just ourselves or our company, but the name that stands behind your company, the owner.
Even though my friends are not in property management, the same business philosophies applies to our industry. In this business, we are taught to retain residents (of course!), keep vacancies down (of course!), and to stay on budget (of course!) but has anyone really sat down and told us to "think owner"? A few months back someone had started a discussion on Multifamily Insiders discussing second chance renters who found themselves in foreclosure and laid off due to the economical turmoil. The person who began the discussion felt that their management company was treating these people unfairly and they deserved a second chance to prove themselves as they were just a victim of the current economical downturn despite the fact that they did not meet the property's current rental criteria. After that discussion, I planned on blogging about this topic but it took my friends talking about it to remind me of why it is so important.
On a daily basis, we make several decisions that affect the economical success of our properties. We chose who to rent to, who to work with, and where to spend money. If you are doing your job correctly, the overwhelming majority of those decisions prove to be a positive outcome. When we make poor decisions it can result in termination of an employee, a skip-out, an eviction, or poor vacancy rate. When we begin to "think owner" your success rate will sky rocket.
What does it mean to "think owner"? Simply stated it means to act as though your decisions will affect your livelihood. Asking questions such as "is the best interest of the owner and not just the tenant?" Purchasing responsibly and hiring responsibly. Following the guidelines of the property and supporting the decisions of the owner. By retaining residents by giving great customer service and leasing to only qualified individuals that meet the property's rental criteria. It also means putting your name behind the service you guarantee and taking responsibility for the decisions you have made for the owner. It means becoming accountable and not just the middle man.
"Thinking owner" means every spending decision is a wise spending decision. Is the purchase the best interest of the property or can you budget it in for a later time? Think of the property's money as your own. When you go to the grocery store and you budgeted $200.00 that week for food and you spend $250.00 you know that you need to take that $50.00 from somewhere else in your household budget. If that $50.00 is your electric bill and you are on the your last notice before shut off you know that you will not be as careless at the store and only purchase the necessities. This should be the same philosophy we bring to our property's spending. If we began thinking this way during our buying procedures for our property we will save money and stay closer to budget. You must know your property's budget and even help with producing one. Should you not be a part of the budgeting for your property, take initiative and ask to be a part of it so that you can be proactive of meeting the goals of your property.
"Thinking owner" also applies to who we rent to as well. I cannot count how many times I have heard a property manager or a leasing consultant go to bat for a total stranger. Still to this day it totally baffles me. If I had a quarter for every time I heard the words, "they are good people that fell on hard times", I would have my bungalow in the Caribbean! "Think owner"... if you feel so confident in this person than feel free to sign on the dotted line and become their guarantor. If you believe they are worthy of second chance then put your livelihood on the line, would you still sign? To stay consistent with leasing, you must develop a rental criteria and stick to it. This should be something that is already developed within your company and if it is outdated or does not exist you should speak immediately to your supervisor to have one developed or updated. It can protect your company from discrimination lawsuits as well as making the line very clear on who to rent to and who not to rent to. By providing a Rental Criteria it removes the gray areas and you spend less time weighing the pros and cons of leasing. Keep in mind, we should be no different than credit card companies or banks providing loans for home ownership, if the applicant does not meet the criteria they aren't approved. They are confident in their criteria and they know with every denial they will have someone qualified apply. For every unqualified resident you lease to that is one less qualified person you could have rented to!
I have spoken to Resident Managers who have denied people for housing and were so guilt stricken they could not sleep. I can honestly say I have never lost sleep over saying no to a prospective resident but I could be the minority. As I have told those managers, I will tell you... it is not our jobs to feel sorry for them or feel obligated to do anything. Our job is to "think owner" and those prospects will find housing elsewhere. Allow your competitors to take a chance on them and you sit back and rent that apartment to someone qualified.
If that doesn't change your mind allow me to show you some personal results. After the initial question was posted on Multifamily Insiders I followed up with 5 people I turned away for housing. I referred 11 people total to a local community in our area that accepted prospects with fewer criterions than my property. Eight out of the 11 applied for housing at the other community and they approved 6 of them. Out of the six only five actually moved in. Out of the five only 2 still reside there as the others resulted in either evictions or skip outs. Out of the two remaining, one is being considered for possible eviction due to lease violation/ noise. Our rental criteria worked in this situation as they gambled on six and only one has been a well-paying resident. My competitor spent thousands of dollars to remove these residents from their property and if they would have just "thought owner" it would have saved them time and money.






Ugh... the dreaded Market Surveys! Am I the only one that feels this way? Our company’s policy is to do a minimum of two each year, although I have read that in some markets it is recommended to do it on a monthly basis. Don't get me wrong, I know the market is continually changing on a day to day basis, and I do see the need for Market Surveys but it still does not make me enjoy doing them nonetheless.
Thank goodness for the internet which saves me a lot of time to accomplish these daunting Market Surveys... but you can't find the real answers until you actually make contact with the other properties. You know the questions I'm referring to, "what's your occupancy?", "Running any specials?", "How's your traffic been?” You know the questions that rarely come with an honest response. If I didn’t have a sense of humor, this could become very frustrating.