|
Dec 13
2011
|
Should Our On-Site Employees Really Be “Jack of all Trades”?
Posted by: Brent Williams on Dec 13, 2011 15:07 |
I hear the “Jack of all Trades” job description a lot regarding our on-site teams, that everybody chips in and works to get the job done. For many, it is almost a badge of honor to be a Jack of all Trades, as it implies that you can handle anything they throw at you. And in that respect, I totally agree! But I also believe it is the model of inefficiency.
First of all, I want to be clear that this isn’t a discussion on whether people should step up when the job needs to be done. For example, if all the leasing consultants are out of the office or otherwise busy, I firmly believe that the community manager has to be ready to take that next prospect on a property tour. Every person needs to be able to rise to the occasion in order to get the job done. However, there is a difference between every person doing every job, and every person having a specific job but able to lend a hand when it is needed.
Let’s look at leasing consultants specifically. A leasing consultant has a wide variety of job functions, from leasing, to customer service, to administrative duties, such as preparing a lease. Sales, customer service, and administrative work are all very different, and often one personality type is rarely fantastic at all three. Years ago when I called the community office home, I can say that I was great at customer service and administrative work, but only average at leasing apartments. But even though I was only average at sales, and my co-leasing consultant was much better than I was, we traded off handling prospects. This clearly was not the best use of our resources!
Ideally, I would have taken over more of the lease paperwork duties, and she would have handled more of the prospects. Our closing rate would have gone up and our paperwork would have been cleaner. Like I said before, this does not mean that if two prospects showed up, I would just sit there and make them wait – I would jump up and get the job done! But my primary job responsibility would be handled differently on a day to day basis.
Even today, MFI is a small team, and we are not nearly as efficient as we could be because we are scattered in so many different directions. If we could be more specialized, we would be much more effective and productive!
What are your thoughts? Do you think that having everybody as a “Jack of all Trades” hurts or helps efficiency?

I began in this industry as a Housekeeper/Make Ready tech. I paid attention, listened, learned, and used my personal experiences, to move up. I was promoted in March of 2007 to Assistant Property Manager, then in November of 2007 to General Property Manager. I know a lot, and I continually learn from my experiences, and from my Maintenance tech, who, aside from my-self, is the only other employee on the property. Yes, it can get complicated when 3 people are all trying to do the SAME job, which is where Goos supervision and time management comes in. So, I agree to disagree, and vice a versa.




I agree. My thoughts go to an assembly line. Could you imagine trying to get a car built with people going back and forth, starting and stopping? Leasing is sales, hire a salesperson. Find an admin that enjoys having the docments accurate and complete.