|
Nov 02
2011
|
For those of you who’ve met me or taken one of my classes, you know that I say what I mean and I mean what I say. I talk the talk and I walk the walk. I tell it like it is (professionally and with care, of course) but If it has to do with not sugar coating things, I’m your girl (of course, I’m not referring to using “visit us” or “live here” words during leasing… then a little fluff is just fine). But in normal every day dealings onsite and at the corporate office… I don’t see the point in wasting time beating around the bush, because TIME is MONEY!
There have been numerous occasions that I am aware of, sadly, that a property manager has not filed an eviction on a resident who hasn’t paid rent by the time it’s due. Despite the action being spelled out, very clearly, in our policy and procedures manual (and common sense if you’ve spent any time in the business).
The manager will have a wide range of reasons as to why they won’t… but the last time I heard the excuse, I nearly fell out of my chair (seriously). She said “Well… I needed the occupancy numbers”. WHAT? What good is a high occupancy percentage if you’re not collecting any rent? She didn’t know the answer. Turns out, this person was a habitual late-rent payer and eventually ended up skipping out… owning an absurd amount of money to the community. Worst yet… he’d been renewed without increase. TWICE!
What baffles me about the above story is two-fold. One… when is it ever ok to not file on someone when they’re past due on rent (and it’s company policy) and Two… why the heck would you renew (and not increase) someone who’s shown they are a resident who can’t be counted on? This person ended up costing the company nearly $10,000 in legal fees, lost rental income and apartment home damage (I know, who would have thought someone who didn’t care enough to pay their rent on time would destroy the home they’re living in too… crazy **note the sarcasm**).
The second example that I’m talking about is with regard to employees… when a cord needs to be cut, because the action of a singular employee is impacting the business (both financially due to poor performance and morale with their employees and their peers who are watching things happen and seeing nothing being done), why are we so slow to cut it?
Now, I am very seasoned with regard to HR and proper procedure… however, nearly all states and all companies have an At Will employment policy. What that means is, you can be fired for no reason at all. But, if there is documented cause and plenty of reason, often, we’re still slow to sever the relationship… and to be honest with you… it infuriates me. When the actions of one affect many and clearly affect the business something needs to be done. Something needs to change. There are only so many chances you can afford an individual before finally holding them accountable and taking action.
Slowly reacting to a resident problem (any kind… not paying rent, violating community policies, being disruptive, etc…) or an employee problem (poor performance, bad attitude, doesn’t play well with others, etc…) costs businesses more than they probably realize. When it comes to the “hard stuff”… like choosing to end the residency or business relationship, we have to take the bull by its horns and take action. Not reacting at all or being too slow to react might just cost you more than that one resident or that one colleague… it might end up costing you several. Can your business afford that?

I have always made every one of the folks on my teams (and the first item on my meeting minutes) place a label on their monitor that says:
Be Brief. Be Bright. Be Gone.
Go get em!
Ross
On the other side it is very frustrating to see those who continue to do things their own way to make the "numbers look good", but with no real positive impact. The absolute worst is being compared to another community that looks good on paper only because of the shady practices of a manager. Why companies keep these people around I'll never know. They have no real loyalty to the company they work for nor to the community they manage. When these managers do leave one company you see them recycled through yet another community. Also as someone who is not fond of rules it really makes my blood boil when we have yet another policy change due to someone’s incompetence. Our company even has a policy on how to write an email. REALLLLYYYY, you trust someone to manage a multi-million dollar asset who can not communicate in a professional manner?????






The sad truth is that what I see are many RPMs who may be over-burdened with extra responsibilities and are not looking closely enough at anything other than "the numbers" that no one is paying attention to what the on-site teams are doing (or not doing.) I know as companies grow, many mid level and on site members are having to do more with less and it is hard to "police" people's actions.
But, that being said, I agree 100% that too many people in positions who repeatedly disregard company policy, whether in the Office or in Maintenance, are allowed to remain. This may be in part due to the human resource/employee policies of counseling a certain amount of times, documenting every conversation, etc. At Will means just that, but I think too any people worry about being "fair" in order to avoid confrontation and litigation.