When a CFL lightbulb burns out, you may dispose of it in any outdoor trash receptacle such as a dumpster or compactor.
Apartment Marketing- Blog posts tagged in Apartment Marketing
Social Media is powerful—that’s pretty much recognized across the board. But a massive social following doesn’t just happen overnight (unless you're like Jeremy Lin or Madonna). Which is why it can be beneficial to promote your community’s virtual presence in the real world.
Here are 21 examples of how businesses create visibility for their social media platforms through means which are offline. Some tactics could clearly translate to the multifamily biz, others would take a bit more creativity. So to get you thinking...
Dillard’s Breezeway Billboard - In a fairly basic attempt, Dillard’s invites shoppers to get updates on special offers and events through their social media platforms, by placing a sign near the store’s entrance. Easy, simple, to the point.
What does the Satisfacts Research survey on “All That Apply: Residents’ Leading Marketing Sources” really mean?
NAA’s UNITS magazine published a Satisfacts Research survey in their April issue titled “All That Apply: Residents’ Leading Marketing Sources.” The web-based survey queried 34,000 apartment residents who had moved within the last year, asking what sources they used from a prepared list of 36 possibilities, giving the option to check up to 20 of these sources.
A survey question like this can tell us a great deal . . . notably that shoppers are utilizing an abundance of information resources, not surprising for most of us.
But does it really tell us that “Drive-by/signage” is the “leading” source, or that social media is “rarely used”?
Doug Miller, President of Satisfacts, was quite gracious in spending time with me over the phone recently to discuss the methodology behind the survey. Here’s what I learned, and what you should also know:
· Survey question: “When you rented at your community, what sources of information did you use to find out about the community? Check all that apply, up to 20.”
· The list of sources was a simple list, no clarification or further explanation provided
· There were 15 Internet sources listed under the heading “Internet”, as in “Internet – Apartments.com”, “Internet – Property Website/Portal” and so on. But many sources were omitted, like RentMineOnline.com, Oodle.com, ApartmentList.com, RentSocial.com and many others that carry apartment content.
· Similarly, all print publication sources were listed with an “Apt Guide” heading . . . “Apt Guide – For Rent”, “Apt Guide – Apartment Guide”, “Apt Guide – Apartment Finder” and “Apt Guide – Other”. While those of us in the industry can muddle through that one, would the typical apartment resident be confused? As one of the provider names is the same as the heading (Apartment Guide), it is easy to imagine that there was some respondent error here.
· Facebook was included as one of the “Internet” choices, as well as Twitter and MySpace (really?), but other social media sites were not listed – like Pinterest, community or management company blogs and other sources where the industry has seen a great deal of activity.
· ApartmentRatings.com was included as an “Internet” source, but not Yelp.com or the many other ratings & reviews options we see the consumer utilizing.
· There’s nothing at all in the survey about Mobile as a source – and that means none of the many apps and mobile sites were taken into consideration. As mobile is the fastest-growing digital resource, this is a big missing component.
So, back to my original question: Does the survey really tell us that drive-by/signage is the “leading” source? Just my opinion, but don’t most of us drive a neighborhood we’re thinking about living in? And while that helps us to know if the geography is right, does it really help a consumer narrow down the specific apartment community they want to take a look at?
Also, with over 80% of Americans now using the Internet (via their desktops, laptops, smart phones and every other digital device with internet connectivity), and over half of Americans purchasing on line, does it really follow that the highest percentage any Internet provider garnered in the survey (Rent.com) was only 14.1%? It just doesn’t add up.
Speaking of “adding up,” I saw a recent communiqué where one marketing provider was totaling their print and Internet percentages from this survey to come up with their “share” of usage. Not so fast – since the survey asked respondents to “check all that apply,” there is overlap in the percentages; totaling is completely erroneous, as the same respondents checked multiple sources.
As a long-time industry supplier with many years in the marketing arena, it troubles me that some readers might misunderstand these survey results, and that other marketing experts in the field are using the information inappropriately. Shouldn’t we really be asking (in addition to a more precise usage survey) what sources are meaningful or most helpful? What type of information is critical in making a decision on where to rent? How important are ratings/reviews and friend’s recommendations in making your decision? It seems to me that those questions would give us much more insightful, actionable answers.
I'd love to know your thoughts!