Enter your email address for weekly access to top multifamily blogs!

Multifamily Blogs

This is some blog description about this site

What does the Satisfacts Research survey on “All That Apply: Residents’ Leading Marketing Sources” really mean?

What does the Satisfacts Research survey on “All That Apply: Residents’ Leading Marketing Sources” really mean?

NAA’s UNITS magazine published a Satisfacts Research survey in their April issue titled “All That Apply:  Residents’ Leading Marketing Sources.”  The web-based survey queried 34,000 apartment residents who had moved within the last year, asking what sources they used from a prepared list of 36 possibilities, giving the option to check up to 20 of these sources. 

A survey question like this can tell us a great deal . . . notably that shoppers are utilizing an abundance of information resources, not surprising for most of us.

But does it really tell us that “Drive-by/signage” is the “leading” source, or that social media is “rarely used”?

Doug Miller, President of Satisfacts, was quite gracious in spending time with me over the phone recently to discuss the methodology behind the survey.  Here’s what I learned, and what you should also know:

·      Survey question:  “When you rented at your community, what sources of information did you use to find out about the community?  Check all that apply, up to 20.” 

·      The list of sources was a simple list, no clarification or further explanation provided

·      There were 15 Internet sources listed under the heading “Internet”, as in “Internet – Apartments.com”, “Internet – Property Website/Portal” and so on.  But many sources were omitted, like RentMineOnline.com, Oodle.com, ApartmentList.com, RentSocial.com and many others that carry apartment content. 

·      Similarly, all print publication sources were listed with an “Apt Guide” heading . . . “Apt Guide – For Rent”, “Apt Guide – Apartment Guide”, “Apt Guide – Apartment Finder” and “Apt Guide – Other”.  While those of us in the industry can muddle through that one, would the typical apartment resident be confused?  As one of the provider names is the same as the heading (Apartment Guide), it is easy to imagine that there was some respondent error here.

·      Facebook was included as one of the “Internet” choices, as well as Twitter and MySpace (really?), but other social media sites were not listed – like Pinterest, community or management company blogs and other sources where the industry has seen a great deal of activity.   

·      ApartmentRatings.com was included as an “Internet” source, but not Yelp.com or the many other ratings & reviews options we see the consumer utilizing.

·      There’s nothing at all in the survey about Mobile as a source – and that means none of the many apps and mobile sites were taken into consideration.  As mobile is the fastest-growing digital resource, this is a big missing component.

So, back to my original question:  Does the survey really tell us that drive-by/signage is the “leading” source?  Just my opinion, but don’t most of us drive a neighborhood we’re thinking about living in?  And while that helps us to know if the geography is right, does it really help a consumer narrow down the specific apartment community they want to take a look at? 

Also, with over 80% of Americans now using the Internet (via their desktops, laptops, smart phones and every other digital device with internet connectivity), and over half of Americans purchasing on line, does it really follow that the highest percentage any Internet provider garnered in the survey (Rent.com) was only 14.1%?  It just doesn’t add up.

Speaking of “adding up,” I saw a recent communiqué where one marketing provider was totaling their print and Internet percentages from this survey to come up with their “share” of usage.  Not so fast – since the survey asked respondents to “check all that apply,” there is overlap in the percentages; totaling is completely erroneous, as the same respondents checked multiple sources. 

As a long-time industry supplier with many years in the marketing arena, it troubles me that some readers might misunderstand these survey results, and that other marketing experts in the field are using the information inappropriately.  Shouldn’t we really be asking (in addition to a more precise usage survey) what sources are meaningful or most helpful?  What type of information is critical in making a decision on where to rent?  How important are ratings/reviews and friend’s recommendations in making your decision?  It seems to me that those questions would give us much more insightful, actionable answers.

I'd love to know your thoughts!

{jomcomment}
 
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Hi Judy,
As with most "surveys" they are a joke really. That said the pun dents love to use them to support their position on this or that. Based on that survey information apartment operators should shut down their web sites and just get a bigger and better Main ID Sign and that would deliver more leases than they could ever want. We all know that is silly. We also know that "Drive By" is important, but that alone does not solve vacancy. We all, also know that residents have no idea where they ever heard of your apartment community and have a significant failure rate.

Perhaps a better survey would be, "What do you type in a search box when looking for an apartment?" That is what apartment marketers should be focused on, How to catch fish on this thing called the internet.

  Eric Brown
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Thanks for the comment, Eric! And what a great idea for a survey question -- that would tell us a lot about consumer behavior and what's important to them. Happy fishing!

  Judy Bellack
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Judy, while I might not agree with all of your points, I respect your experience and knowledge; you shared some good food for thought.

Eric, I'm sorry but I take offense to your comment that "as with most 'surveys' they are really a joke." I dare say our clients would greatly disagree with you as well (they are quite happy about how leveraging "survey" results has helped them achieve a resident turnover rate 17 points below the NAA Income and Expense Survey).

I also take offense to the comment, "pun dents (sic) use them to support their position on this or that." There was no editorial given in what Units published; it simply shared what a sampling of new residents reported in 2011. While there were no interpretations included in the table's sidebar, please know that when I am asked to interpret research, I feel exceptionally qualified given my 15 years in operations, including running the marketing departments for two NMHC Top 50 firms, as well as my experience over the past 12 years providing feedback programs for nearly a million units nationally each year.

Regarding the findings, don't shoot the messenger. We ask a simple question, and we organize the options by category (i.e. Internet, Referral, etc.). As you know, asking "source" is an issue due to most people not remembering if they used apartments.com or apartmentguide.com, or forrent.com or 4walls.com. There are many options and they use many sources...it's hard to keep them all straight. While "respondent error" happens, professionally conducted research takes steps to minimize this.

On “drive by” an apartment community being located in a neighborhood someone desires to live in does play a significant role in one's search. While people use a myriad of sources, the constant among most shoppers is driving in neighborhoods close to where they work or want to live. Location matters in real estate decisions!

Regarding the media options listed, the list changes practically weekly. Note that Units...

Judy, while I might not agree with all of your points, I respect your experience and knowledge; you shared some good food for thought.

Eric, I'm sorry but I take offense to your comment that "as with most 'surveys' they are really a joke." I dare say our clients would greatly disagree with you as well (they are quite happy about how leveraging "survey" results has helped them achieve a resident turnover rate 17 points below the NAA Income and Expense Survey).

I also take offense to the comment, "pun dents (sic) use them to support their position on this or that." There was no editorial given in what Units published; it simply shared what a sampling of new residents reported in 2011. While there were no interpretations included in the table's sidebar, please know that when I am asked to interpret research, I feel exceptionally qualified given my 15 years in operations, including running the marketing departments for two NMHC Top 50 firms, as well as my experience over the past 12 years providing feedback programs for nearly a million units nationally each year.

Regarding the findings, don't shoot the messenger. We ask a simple question, and we organize the options by category (i.e. Internet, Referral, etc.). As you know, asking "source" is an issue due to most people not remembering if they used apartments.com or apartmentguide.com, or forrent.com or 4walls.com. There are many options and they use many sources...it's hard to keep them all straight. While "respondent error" happens, professionally conducted research takes steps to minimize this.

On “drive by” an apartment community being located in a neighborhood someone desires to live in does play a significant role in one's search. While people use a myriad of sources, the constant among most shoppers is driving in neighborhoods close to where they work or want to live. Location matters in real estate decisions!

Regarding the media options listed, the list changes practically weekly. Note that Units pulled our 2011 Index, so some of the sites were not around in 2011 or had not yet begun getting major attention/usage. For example: RentAdvisor, a cool site rolled out this year by an extremely awesome team, was RentWiki in 2011; RentWiki was on the list of options in our 2011 surveys. We update the list used several times a year, but it is impossible to have it 100% up to date due to the frequency of changes.

Amidst the comments in the discussion I didn't see references to our other findings presented on the same page in Units - results from our "Inside the Head of Today's Online Renter" study. This study of online renters from 20 diverse portfolios included a generic list of sources. The findings provided a different perspective - which is why we provided both to Units - so that people could see several takes on the same subject and make their own interpretations. Here's what these residents reported:

- 79% cited listings sites (i.e., Craigslist), apartment “shopping” sites (i.e., Apartments.com, ApartmentGuide.com)
- 78% cited apartment community or management company websites
- 69% cited driving in neighborhoods they wanted to live in
- 59% cited asking friends and co-workers
- 55% cited using a search engine
- 51% cited ratings and review websites such as ApartmentRatings.com
- 32% cited printed apartment guides
- 13% said they used an apartment community’s social networking profiles in their search (the figure for 18-24 year olds was less than 20%). Ask yourself, “How many times in the last 60 days have I gone to Facebook to help research a purchase or gain input on a buying decision?” When teaching a course at the University of Georgia's PM program last month, I asked 40 college kids that same question; 4 raised their hand. Social has a place in apartment marketing, but it just does not yet have the same usage as ratings sites, ILS's, etc. It will be fascinating to see how things change over time.
- 13% cited newspaper advertising

Lastly, you raise an interesting point info every marketer would love to know the answer to - “Perhaps a better survey would be, ‘What do you type in a search box when looking for an apartment?’ That is what apartment marketers should be focused on, How to catch fish on this thing called the internet.” While one could ask this on a survey (noting the issue of whether people can remember what words they typed in the search), this survey guy actually thinks Google AdWords and Analytics are a great starting point for empirical data, as well as asking your ILS partners if they can access/share data on what people were searching for when they found your listings.

Read More
  Doug Miller
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Judy,

Very interesting topic. Like many of us on the vendor side can attest, surveys, comscore reports etc..can be used in many different ways to support the company that signs our paychecks. In fact I know of some companies that use partner or affiliate sites performance data in their national presentations to boost the unique visits or interactions. I think that should be discussed as well. I guess when you think about it, we can all find some report that shows us as #1 and since that's the fact I see great benefit in this type of survey. I believe it proves that multiple sites, products, signage are all valuable to marketing a community. If not, then we would all be out of business.

I do pause at one remark:

"Speaking of “adding up,” I saw a recent communiqué where one marketing provider was totaling their print and Internet percentages from this survey to come up with their “share” of usage. Not so fast – since the survey asked respondents to “check all that apply,” there is overlap in the percentages; totaling is completely erroneous, as the same respondents checked multiple sources. "

Using the phrase completely erroneous may be a reach. I feel the author of this survey was making a broader point that nothing should be dismissed and all of the companies listed in this survey have a tremendous reach. The value proposition of a company that can offer multiple products to produce a lead is of great value to a consumer and in my opinion as great as the many options multi-family marketing departments have in choosing options of how they want their product represented. The dual percentages of the company you refer to are greater than a stand alone internet source or a stand alone print source. So I would agree that the sum of these totals may not be accurate however, I ask, how can you find facts erroneous? Or is it just the sum that you are questioning?

I greatly enjoyed reading your take on this. Great post.

  Jamie Jump
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Doug, thanks so much for your comments . . . I, too, respect your experience and knowledge, and know that you provide an extremely valuable service to the industry. And I hope you didn't think I was shooting the messenger (such a nice one!) -- this is simply one of those situations where we can agree to disagree on several points. As you and I have discussed, the debate is part of what Multifamily Insiders is all about and ultimately very healthy for the industry.

I couldn't agree with you more on your point regarding empirical data -- it really is the definitive resource when looking at online consumer behavior and there is a wealth of it to be dissected, analyzed and understood. One thing's for sure -- consumer behavior is constantly changing (look at the amazing increase in mobile search activity). Here at Apartment Guide, fully 25% of our total activity is now attributable to mobile, mostly due to the introduction of the smart phone over just the last several years; and I'm sure similar numbers are reflected on other sites and in other industries.

And Jamie, so nice to see you on this comment trail! I agree with you that data can be appropriately employed to support a product or service, but I think the key to doing this with integrity is, of course, accuracy of data as well as transparency, transparency, transparency! So let's be completely transparent -- yes, Apartment Guide comScore data does represent our family of sites, primarily ApartmentGuide.com and Rentals.com (all of which carry our advertisers' apartment listing content) -- and this is standard among the ILS sites, many of which have a "family" of sites carrying the same content. It is also a standard reporting methodology for comScore.

As for your remarks about the marketing provider that totaled category percentages from the survey, let's be transparent here as well -- Apartment Finder produced a flyer that quoted a "share of usage" from the survey, and I do stand by my evaluation...

Doug, thanks so much for your comments . . . I, too, respect your experience and knowledge, and know that you provide an extremely valuable service to the industry. And I hope you didn't think I was shooting the messenger (such a nice one!) -- this is simply one of those situations where we can agree to disagree on several points. As you and I have discussed, the debate is part of what Multifamily Insiders is all about and ultimately very healthy for the industry.

I couldn't agree with you more on your point regarding empirical data -- it really is the definitive resource when looking at online consumer behavior and there is a wealth of it to be dissected, analyzed and understood. One thing's for sure -- consumer behavior is constantly changing (look at the amazing increase in mobile search activity). Here at Apartment Guide, fully 25% of our total activity is now attributable to mobile, mostly due to the introduction of the smart phone over just the last several years; and I'm sure similar numbers are reflected on other sites and in other industries.

And Jamie, so nice to see you on this comment trail! I agree with you that data can be appropriately employed to support a product or service, but I think the key to doing this with integrity is, of course, accuracy of data as well as transparency, transparency, transparency! So let's be completely transparent -- yes, Apartment Guide comScore data does represent our family of sites, primarily ApartmentGuide.com and Rentals.com (all of which carry our advertisers' apartment listing content) -- and this is standard among the ILS sites, many of which have a "family" of sites carrying the same content. It is also a standard reporting methodology for comScore.

As for your remarks about the marketing provider that totaled category percentages from the survey, let's be transparent here as well -- Apartment Finder produced a flyer that quoted a "share of usage" from the survey, and I do stand by my evaluation that the "totaling is completely erroneous." It is not mathematically correct to total percentages in this situation where respondents are checking more than one category. If Apartment Guide had produced such a flyer, I would be saying the same thing (and would have pulled the flyer from circulation). I do agree with you that value can be found in many options available to the industry -- but would again emphasize that empirical data is the best, most accurate measure.

Again, thanks to both of you for your comments!

Read More
  Judy Bellack
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Hi Judy, great topic. Surveys are good when they can provide insight that you don’t otherwise have but even more powerful when you can provide action items based on responses and correlate 1) Survey Results to Metrics and 2) Metrics to Behavior. Without additional insight or tying results to metrics and behavior, a survey is pretty much useless. Having said that, Satisfacts’ survey does provide me some additional insight. First, there are a lot of lead generation sources out there and not one source dominates. Secondly, the average person went to just under 2 lead sources as reported by the survey. I wouldn’t be surprised if the actual number of lead sources is even higher in actuality but nonetheless, people are looking for more information which begs the question, “what really makes a person decide to view a prospective community?” In other words, what lead source pushes a potential resident over the edge based on the marketing quality? In this day and age, I believe that objective and transparent data is a large component of the marketing approach. In the resident surveys we conduct in the multi-family industry, we take a different approach as it relates to traffic and lead conversion. For existing residents, we tie the actual traffic source to a “loyalty score” and break the information down by generation (Gen Y, Gen X, etc). This approach allows our customers to determine whether the marketing source has done an effective job of setting expectations up front and addresses the quality of the lead traffic. Thus, I recommend addressing the following questions and correlating the relationships between these three questions: 1) What was your lead source? 2) What ultimately made you decide to visit the community (promotional materials, amenities, your experience with telephone and/or internet professional) and 3) how loyal are you to remaining as a resident of these community? The relationships of the three questions can provide significant insight...

Hi Judy, great topic. Surveys are good when they can provide insight that you don’t otherwise have but even more powerful when you can provide action items based on responses and correlate 1) Survey Results to Metrics and 2) Metrics to Behavior. Without additional insight or tying results to metrics and behavior, a survey is pretty much useless. Having said that, Satisfacts’ survey does provide me some additional insight. First, there are a lot of lead generation sources out there and not one source dominates. Secondly, the average person went to just under 2 lead sources as reported by the survey. I wouldn’t be surprised if the actual number of lead sources is even higher in actuality but nonetheless, people are looking for more information which begs the question, “what really makes a person decide to view a prospective community?” In other words, what lead source pushes a potential resident over the edge based on the marketing quality? In this day and age, I believe that objective and transparent data is a large component of the marketing approach. In the resident surveys we conduct in the multi-family industry, we take a different approach as it relates to traffic and lead conversion. For existing residents, we tie the actual traffic source to a “loyalty score” and break the information down by generation (Gen Y, Gen X, etc). This approach allows our customers to determine whether the marketing source has done an effective job of setting expectations up front and addresses the quality of the lead traffic. Thus, I recommend addressing the following questions and correlating the relationships between these three questions: 1) What was your lead source? 2) What ultimately made you decide to visit the community (promotional materials, amenities, your experience with telephone and/or internet professional) and 3) how loyal are you to remaining as a resident of these community? The relationships of the three questions can provide significant insight into how the community approaches their customer experience / marketing strategy. Understanding who your customer is and how to communicate to them is critical in today’s competitive environment.

Read More
  Francis Chow
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Francis, great comments! Thank you for weighing in.

  Judy Bellack

Comment Below

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location