HUD just extended the deadline for the new energy-efficiency standards for HUD-and USDA-financed new construction… again

Topic Author
  • Posts: 1
  • Thank you received: 3
1 month 2 weeks ago #647355 by Jules Thetford
Affordability vs. performance.
Speed vs. sustainability.
Short-term cost vs. long-term value.

The original Nov 2025 date is now May 28, 2026. At surface level, it feels like “good news”... more time, more breathing room, less pressure on budgets. But if you look deeper… the delay exposes the same tension multifamily keeps circling around:

Here’s what I’m paying attention to:
1. We say sustainability matters… until the price tag shows up. The stricter 2021 IECC + ASHRAE 90.1-2019 standards are absolutely meant to improve energy performance, resident experience, and long-term operating cost. So by delaying them again,... sends a mixed message.

2. The industry’s “not ready yet” argument is understandable… but risky.
The facts aren’t wrong,... costs, supply chain, labor, and implementation training are real challenges. But waiting until a mandate forces readiness has never been a winning strategy in multifamily. It just compresses pressure later.

3. Delays give breathing room… but also permission to stay behind.
This is the part nobody wants to say out loud: Every delay gives owners, operators, and construction teams another year to postpone the inevitable... modernizing infrastructure. And that’s the blueprint for long-term risk: higher utilities, higher maintenance, higher exposure, lower resilience.

4. Higher standards = better outcomes for residents AND owners. The argument that these standards “cost too much” is real… But so are the savings, safety improvements, and competitive advantages that come with better lighting, visibility, efficiency, and system design.

And this is where I differentiate myself:
I’m not interested in checking the box on compliance.
I’m interested in creating optimization, sustainability, performance.
Because the goal isn’t just to do the work
it’s to do it in a way that moves people forward.

As someone who lives at the intersection of multifamily, safety, lighting design, MEP readiness, and capital strategy; I’ve seen firsthand that the communities who embrace higher performance early… also win early.
Better NOI, better retention, better resident experience, better longevity.

Here’s my question for the industry:
If the higher standards weren’t mandated…
Would you still choose to build or design to them now?
Or do you wait until the compliance date forces your hand?
Do we believe in high-performance housing or not?

I genuinely want your perspective. And depending on the role you play in this industry, you probably land on very different sides.
Where do you land?

lnkd.in/gX4-YDKp
1 month 2 weeks ago #647355 by Jules Thetford
Kevin A. Weishaar, CBC, CPO, CPM
1 month 1 week ago #647356 by Kevin A. Weishaar, CBC, CPO, CPM
Delays ease short-term pressure, but true leaders invest in high-performance now creating long-term value, resilience, and better outcomes for residents and owners alike.
1 month 1 week ago #647356 by Kevin A. Weishaar, CBC, CPO, CPM