Enter your email address for weekly access to top multifamily blogs!

Multifamily Blogs

This is some blog description about this site

Airbnb is Banning White Supremacists - Should Multifamily Operators Follow Suit?

Airbnb is Banning White Supremacists - Should Multifamily Operators Follow Suit?

Airbnb is Banning White Supremacists - Should Multifamily Operators Follow Suit?

Following the protests, counter protests, and violence in Charlottesville, Airbnb has begun purging people associated with the Unite the Right Free Speech Rally.  Specifically, Airbnb asks their users to sign a commitment to "accept people regardless of their race, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or age", which applies to guests, as well as those renting their property on Airbnb.  It is unclear what the threshold for being banned might be, whether it is merely participating in a rally or involved in actual violence, and it is also unclear how Airbnb will monitor those who abuse their terms of service in that regard.

On Bloomberg TV, the co-founder of Airbnb, Nathan Blecharczyk, said that "hate displayed this week has been shocking".  He continued, " We make every one of our users sign a pledge when they sign up that they will not discriminate and exhibit hatred.  Whenever we become aware of such examples they are permanently banned from platform."

Considering that Airbnb already has begun to tie in with multifamily operators, this already affects the multifamily sector.  But even beyond that, I'm curious as to what you all think: 

Do you think that Airbnb should have taken this stance?

Do you think multifamily properties should be following suit and take a more active role in restricting renting to those who are part of these types of groups?

 
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Isn't that discrimination?

  tim littrell
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Great question! I am no Fair Housing expert, so take this with a grain of salt...

I think if any community banned "white supremacists", it would probably be a fair housing violation because it is discriminating partly upon their race. However, Airbnb wasn't doing that, exactly. Their rules banned people from certain actions, and members of that group were doing those actions, which got them banned. As long as the actions are not inherently tied to a protected class, then I don't see the violation exactly. But again, I'm not a Fair Housing expert, so I can't say for sure.

  Brent Williams
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Actually, I may be wrong on this. If they have a rule but only apply it to one group (white males) and not to others, that would likely be an issue of discrimination. So the rule itself might not be discriminatory, but the way Airbnb has specifically implemented the rule might be. Again, not an expert - just thinking through the different aspects. Note: That potentially means that the rule could be in place if it was implemented consistently. (I'm not advocating for it - just discussing it)

  Comment was last edited about 6 years ago by Brent Williams Brent Williams
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Why target just the one group? Not that I am condoning their beliefs or actions, but they are not the only problem.

  M. Myers
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Discrimination is discrimination. If we allow this, then where does it stop?

  Rachel
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I would think they could fight and say its discrimination against their "creed" - slippery slope no matter what, for sure.
Like others that have commented, targeting any one group- is discrimination and AirBnB may have just opened a can of worms by singling out this group- good, bad or otherwise.

  Lisa Thomsen
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

I think that a lot of groups and individuals are seeking attention. And when they get it, they might not want it. In this instance, I am sure the potential legal fight between Aribnb and a host of litigants should cause investors in the company to hit the panic button. That said, until a particular political affiliation becomes a PROTECTED class, owners should stick to the current fair housing guidelines as a beacon of light to guide them through this free speech issue.

  Paul
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

The 1st amendment gives all of us the right to free speech, hence this forum. Banning someone for their beliefs is inherently wrong in my opinion. Essentially you are saying you don't have the right to think that way and voice that opinion. It may be an opinion (lifestyle, belief, etc.) that we do not agree with, but it's theirs and they own it. It is a very bumpy road to follow. I do believe that what Airbnb has chosen to do is discrimination and it is not something that we should follow in our industry. I do believe it will leave us open to a possible lawsuit. However, thanks to the 1st amendment and the soldiers that have fought for our country, I have the right to voice my opinion freely and openly, just as the groups and people I don’t agree with do.

  Beth
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

While I imagine that most of us find extremist on the right and the left undesirable are we now going to accept the concept that people who express themselves using their First Amendment Right to do so are to be descriminated against? If we choose to accept the concept of political discrimination the question is where does that stop? No Hillary or no Trump supporters? No Right-to-Life types versus Pro-abortion rights supporters? I personally despise both the Neo-nazis and the Black Panthers but discriminating against someone's political belief because I find it despicable sounds like it's just another type of housing descrimination. Having an open society means it is open to everyone without qualifications.

  Dan Rigney
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Great question Brent...I think it's worth asking because someone out in the multifamily universe is wondering it! I'm with the folks who responded, I don't think banning someone for their beliefs would fly legally. I may not agree with someone's beliefs, but our nation protects most forms of speech, even (especially?) speech that the majority of people might find repugnant.

  Rommel Anacan

Comment Below

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

Recent Blogs