Enter your email address for weekly access to top multifamily blogs!


This is some blog description about this site

Responsive Design vs. Mobile-Specific for Apartment Websites

Responsive Design vs. Mobile-Specific for Apartment Websites

In recent years debate has unfolded on whether web designers should use responsive web design or build a separate, native mobile site.  Responsive sites automatically resize elements on the page to fit whatever device is being used.  Mobile-specific sites are specifically designed for mobile phones and native touch-screen functions. There are advantages to both, and strong feelings lie on each side of the ideological fight. For multifamily marketers, it's important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each when evaluating mobile options for apartment websites, so you can provide your target audience with the best possible mobile experience, considering the intended mobile behaviors and preferences of current/prospective residents. So here's a quick compare and contrast to help equip you for your team's next mobile/responsive discussion:

Mobile-Specific Sites


Websites designed specifically for mobile environments are known for catering site content/functions to appeal specifically to mobile users' intended actions when visiting your site. Mobile users generally want information quicker than users on a desktop. Mobile-specific takes this into consideration and is designed to get them what they need without the fuss or frills.  They also provide calls to action (CTAs) that are most opportune for a mobile user's likely stance in the sales cycle, which for apartment seekers would probably be "Call Today", "Map it", or "Submit a Guest Card." You'll also find that mobile sites generally have faster load times.


The biggest challenge with a mobile-specific site is that it requires a different code base from your desktop site. You're essentially creating (and maintaining) two different websites, which can get expensive to develop and tedious to update. And while the content and function of the mobile-specific works amazing for the targeted mobile audience it's created to serve (prospective/current residents), it may not serve outlying audiences (investors, job seekers, community members...) with the information they want.

Responsive Sites


Responsive websites have gained considerable popularity for the efficiencies provided by a single code base, which is less expensive to develop and easier to maintain. It also accommodates a far broader variety of devices, including tablets. Lastly, as Nathan Singleton with Property Solutions explains, responsive sites have stronger advantages for SEO, “With a responsive designed website, you don’t have workarounds and re-directs to deal with. Having a second site (mobile only, for example) fragments your rankings, since each site counts as something unique."


On the flip side, responsive sites have potential for longer load times on mobile, and you run the risk that not all devices will ideally "respond" and resize as you intend and cripple the user experience. Using a responsive site can also impact reporting because it can be an added challenge to distinguish traffic source between mobile, tablet, and desktop—making it difficult to measure the effectiveness of targeted marketing campaigns.

The decision to go with a responsive site or mobile-optimized site isn't one to be taken lightly. Before you make your choice, it’s important to clearly define specific objectives for site functionality, usability, and performance, and determine which option can best deliver what you need.


By: Tyler Tucker

Rate this blog entry:
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

As an avid tablet user, I much prefer responsive design. Often mobile-only sites don't offer most of the information I need and are overly-simplistic for a tablet. Usually viewing the full site isn't a great option either, as links and buttons aren't set up for touch, and some sites redirect the visitor back to the mobile version every time a new page loads, making it impossible to navigate through the full site.


Comment Below

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Let's face it: it's a mobile app world, and we're just living in it. According to eMarketer, smartphone users spend 90 percent of their time online in apps. One study showed that the total sessions in travel/navigation apps increased 50 percent worldwide between 2016 and 2018, while another one indicated that more than half of consumers (57 percent) have used a retailer's mobile app while in-store. Yet another one demonstrated that consumers are expected to download 258.2 billion mobile apps in ...
The average time spent browsing on a smartphone per month in the US is 87 hours, compared with 34 hours on desktop, and more than 70 percent of total digital minutes are spent on mobile devices. Additionally, Google reports that more than half of its search queries globally occur on mobile devices.   If that isn’t enough to convince you to put mobile first in your marketing activities, nothing is. While mobile plays a significant role in multifamily business today, that pales in compariso...
Just this month, Safari celebrated its 10 year anniversary as Apple Inc.’s landmark web browser for the Mac operating system. Since it was first released in 2002, Safari has taken over an admirable 13 to 15 percent of the U.S. market, through its use of products like Apple’s MacBook, iPad, and iPhone. But overall, Internet Explorer (IE) has managed to sustain its 13-year reign as America’s most widely used web browser.* However, when you narrow-in on web traffic to apartment websites, these dist...