Enter your email address for weekly access to top multifamily blogs!

Multifamily Blogs

This is some blog description about this site

The $100 Billion Lie: Cable ISPs Have Been Calling "Capacity" Speed for 30+ Years—And Everyone's Paying the Price

The $100 Billion Lie: Cable ISPs Have Been Calling "Capacity" Speed for 30+ Years—And Everyone's Paying the Price

Internet Speed - The Big lie

Cable ISPs call Mbps "speed"—it's not. Discover the 4 metrics that matter for fiber backed WiFi for multifamily properties and why property owners need transparency.

For 30+ years, cable internet providers have built a $100+ billion industry on one simple deception:

They call "Mbps" speed. It's not.

The Shipping Truck Analogy: What's Actually Happening with Your Internet

Think of internet performance like shipping cargo in a semi truck. This makes the deception crystal clear:

BANDWIDTH = Size of the Cargo Hold (1000 Boxes Max)
  • This is what ISPs advertise: "1 Gig speeds!"
  • It's the truck's maximum capacity
MBPS (Capacity - NOT SPEED) = Actual Boxes in Your Cargo
  • ISPs advertise 1000 boxes of space
  • Reality? They SHARE your cargo hold with other customers' boxes (oversubscribed)
  • During peak hours (7-9pm), they squeeze more boxes into your truck
  • Cable networks: Your 1000-box truck carries 600 of YOUR boxes + 400 boxes for OTHER customers
  • Dedicated fiber: All 1000 boxes are YOURS—no sharing
LATENCY = Total Time to Deliver Your Packages Across Town
  • Cable: 25 minutes (slows to 40 minutes during rush hour)
  • Fiber: 10 minutes (same time 24/7, no traffic delays)
  • THIS is actual speed—lower delivery time = faster service
  • When residents say "the internet is slow," they're experiencing this 40-minute delivery time, not the truck size
JITTER = Consistency of That Delivery Time
  • Cable: Stop-and-go traffic, constantly changing travel time (5-10ms variation)
  • Fiber: Cruise control smooth, consistent delivery time (<1ms variation)
  • Impact: Inconsistent delivery = choppy Zoom calls and gaming lag spikes
PACKET LOSS = Boxes Damaged or Lost in Transit
  • Cable: 0.5-1% lost during peak hours (shared truck, rough roads)
  • Fiber: <0.01% (dedicated truck, express lane—effectively zero)
  • Reality check: You'd fire a shipping company that lost 1% of your packages. Cable ISPs call this "acceptable performance."

Mbps measures capacity—how much data can move per second. Speed is how FAST that data moves, measured in milliseconds (latency). It's the difference between a massive truck that takes 40 minutes to deliver your packages versus a smaller truck that delivers in 10 minutes.

Cable ISPs know this. They've always known this. And they've spent billions in marketing dollars making sure the world doesn't.

When fiber competitors emerged in the 2000s with latency numbers 3-5x better than cable, the industry didn't fix their infrastructure. They doubled down on capacity marketing. "Up to 1 Gig speeds!" they shouted, while burying the metrics that actually matter—latency, jitter, packet loss, and upload speeds—in technical fine print.

This isn't just misleading marketing. It's strategic deception. And for property owners evaluating internet providers for multifamily properties, this lie is costing you resident satisfaction, occupancy, and exit value.

The "BIG Compensation": How Cable ISPs Stay Afloat with 100-Year-Old Infrastructure

Here's how they've survived for so long:

Cable ISPs can't fix their latency problem without replacing their entire coaxial cable infrastructure—a technology literally from the 1930s that would cost billions to upgrade.

So instead of fixing the problem, they compensate with more capacity.

Their pitch? 

         "If we give you a BIGGER truck (1 Gig bandwidth), you won't notice it takes 40 minutes to deliver across town  instead of 10 minutes."

It's genius, really. Capacity is cheap to increase. You just cram more data through the same old pipes. Marketing "1000 Mbps speeds!" sounds impressive. And most customers don't know enough to ask about the metrics that actually determine their experience.

But here's what they're hiding:

  • Your video calls don't need more bandwidth—they need FAST, CONSISTENT delivery (low latency, low jitter)
  • Gaming doesn't need more bandwidth—it needs QUICK response times (low latency)
  • Cloud apps don't need more bandwidth—they need INSTANT reactions (low latency)
  • Remote work doesn't need more download capacity—it needs UPLOAD capacity (which cable caps at 7% of download)

When residents complain about "laggy Zoom calls" or "slow internet during peak hours," they're not experiencing a capacity problem. They're experiencing the reality of 100-year-old infrastructure that cable ISPs refuse to replace.

That's the "BIG Compensation." And the punchline? When you question the performance, they point to the bandwidth number and say: "But look how BIG our trucks are!"

Here's What Cable ISPs Would Advertise If They Were Honest

"Get 1000 Mbps bandwidth! (But we share your cargo space with other customers, so you get 600 boxes during peak hours.) We'll only give you 35 Mbps upload. Your delivery takes 25 minutes normally, 40 minutes during rush hour, with inconsistent delivery times, and we'll lose 0.5-1% of your data. Best effort only, no guarantees."

                                                                                "Oh, and our trucks are from the 1930s. But look how BIG they are!"

Compare that to what they actually advertise:

"Get 1 Gig speeds!"

See the problem?

Why This Matters for Property Owners

When residents experience Zoom lag, gaming issues, or peak hour slowdowns, they're not experiencing a capacity problem. They're experiencing:

  1. High latency (slow delivery times)
  2. High jitter (inconsistent delivery)
  3. Oversubscription (shared bandwidth)
  4. Packet loss (lost data)

And perception matters for occupancy.

The Marketing Problem

You can't differentiate with "Internet included." Every property says that.

What actually moves the needle: "Fiber-Backed Symmetrical WiFi—500/500 Mbps Upload & Download"

That specificity signals premium infrastructure, not commodity internet. As we detailed in our blog about 5 breakthrough technologies transforming multifamily, 86% of renters rank connectivity as the #1 most important amenity—more important than pools, fitness centers, or parking.

Ownership = Control Over Quality

When you own the infrastructure rather than outsourcing to a cable ISP, you control:

  • The resident experience
  • The quality of service
  • The narrative around internet performance
  • An asset that adds to property value

This ownership model also creates passive income—a concept multifamily owners know intimately from syndications. You invest passively in infrastructure, a provider operates it actively, and you collect $30-50/door monthly. That's $72,000-$120,000 annually for a 200-unit property, adding $2.18M+ to property value at exit.

The 7 Questions Property Owners Should Ask (That Cable ISPs Won't Answer)

Most property owners accept ISPs' marketing at face value. Smart operators dig deeper:

1. What's the UPLOAD capacity? (Not just download)
  • Cable: 35 Mbps upload vs 500 Mbps download (7% ratio)
  • Fiber: 500/500 Mbps (symmetrical)
  • Remote work killed cable's asymmetrical model
2. Do you share my bandwidth with other customers?
  • Cable: Yes, heavily oversubscribed
  • Fiber (DIA): No, dedicated capacity
  • This is why cable slows down at 7-9pm when everyone's home
3. What's your latency during peak hours?
  • Cable: 25ms average, spikes to 40-50ms
  • Fiber: 10ms average, consistent 24/7
  • This 40-minute vs 10-minute delivery time is what residents experience as "slow internet"
4. What's your jitter during congestion?
  • Cable: 5-10ms jitter
  • Fiber: <1ms jitter
  • Jitter = choppy video calls and lag spikes
5. What's your packet loss percentage?
  • Cable: 0.5-1.5% during peak hours
  • Fiber: <0.01% (effectively zero)
  • Even 1% packet loss causes buffering and disconnects
6. Do these numbers change during peak hours?
  • Cable: Yes, significant degradation
  • Fiber: No, consistent performance
  • If they won't answer this, you have your answer
7. Do you guarantee these metrics with an SLA?
  • Cable: No, "best effort" only
  • Fiber: Yes, performance guaranteed

Cable ISPs won't answer most of these questions. Because the answers look bad.

Not All Fiber Is Equal: DIA vs GPON

Critical distinction most property owners don't know:

GPON (Gigabit Passive Optical Network)

  • Shared fiber that splits bandwidth among multiple users
  • Similar to how cable networks operate
  • Performance degrades during peak hours

DIA (Dedicated Internet Access)

  • Dedicated fiber capacity with guaranteed performance
  • No sharing with other customers
  • Consistent performance 24/7

When evaluating fiber backed WiFi for multifamily properties, ask specifically which type of fiber infrastructure you're getting. The performance difference is substantial.

The Real Cost of the Lie

Property owners often view internet as a cost center. Smart operators recognize it as:

  1. Revenue opportunity: $30-50/door monthly
  2. Retention strategy: Reduces $2,000-4,000 turnover costs per unit
  3. Exit value: $2.18M+ added for 200-unit property

As documented in this BiggerPockets case study, properties with documented, high-quality internet infrastructure sell for premium valuations because institutional buyers recognize both the revenue stream and the retention value.

The retention economics:

  • Average turnover cost: $2,000-4,000 per unit
  • If poor internet causes just 3% higher turnover on a 200-unit property, that's $12,000-24,000 in unnecessary costs annually
  • Meanwhile, premium connectivity commands higher rents and improves occupancy in competitive markets
Action Steps for Property Owners
  1. Audit your current provider using the 7 questions above
  2. Review your marketing - Are you underselling premium infrastructure with generic "high-speed internet" language?
  3. Understand the ownership model - Do you own the infrastructure (asset on balance sheet) or just contract with an ISP?
  4. Calculate the true ROI - Factor in retention value, not just monthly revenue
  5. Get specifications in writing - Verbal promises mean nothing; demand SLAs

For properties considering upgrades or new construction, the time to build proper infrastructure is now—before you're forced to retrofit at 5-10x the cost when residents demand it.

The Bottom Line

For 30+ years, cable ISPs have called capacity "speed" because:

  1. Consumers didn't know better
  2. Capacity is cheap to increase
  3. Admitting the truth would expose their infrastructure problem
  4. The industry built $100+ billion on this terminology

But the lie is catching up to them. Remote work exposed their weak upload speeds. Gaming exposed their high latency. Zoom exposed their jitter. And fiber competitors are forcing transparency.

                                                                          Property owners deserve better than "But look how BIG our trucks are!"

You wouldn't tolerate a shipping company that:

  • Uses trucks from the 1930s
  • Shares your cargo space with other customers
  • Takes 40 minutes instead of 10
  • Loses 1% of packages
  • Then brags about truck size

Why accept it from your internet provider?

Ready to demand transparency? Get a performance-based quote with latency, jitter, and packet loss guarantees—not just Mbps marketing.

Related Resources:

 

Recent Blogs