Across much of the country, rental housing is in a very different place than it was just a couple of years ago. After a historic run-up in demand and rents, vacancies have ticked up, concessions are back in a big way, and operators are competing harder for every qualified household.
According to Census data summarized by industry analysts, the national rental vacancy rate edged up to roughly 6.9% in late 2024, up from about 6.6% a year earlier, with some Sunbelt and Midwestern metros posting double-digit rental vacancy rates. At the same time, a robust construction pipeline has delivered more than 500,000 new apartments in 2024 alone, putting additional pressure on existing assets.
To fill those units, many operators are turning to discounts. Fannie Mae's multifamily commentary notes a rise in properties offering concessions as new supply comes online, and Zillow reported that roughly one-third of property managers were offering lease incentives by mid-2024, with concessions attached to more than half of listings in several major metros. More recent data show that the share of listings on Zillow with a concession has climbed above 37%.
In short: we're giving away a lot of rent to win (or keep) residents.
At the Pet-Inclusive Housing Initiative (PIHI), we believe there's a better lever to pull—one that aligns with resident demand, strengthens communities, and improves the bottom line: rethinking how we treat pets.
Pets are not a niche amenity. They are the norm.
Research from animal-welfare organizations finds that about 72% of renters already have pets, and broader national surveys show that nearly half of U.S. households have dogs and roughly a quarter have cats. PIHI's own survey work with renters and property managers shows just how deeply people feel about these animals: 92% of renters and 93% of property managers say pets are important members of the family.
When renters shop for a home, pet policies are often the first filter—not an afterthought. In one national survey of renters, more than 80% said pet policies played a major role in where they chose to live, and nearly 90% reported having a pet; even among renters without pets today, over half planned to get one within a year.
That's the demand side. On the supply side, the story is more complicated.
On paper, it looks like the industry has embraced pets. PIHI's Pets & Housing Data: 2025 Edition finds that roughly 79% of rental properties say they allow pets. But when you look more closely at breed and weight restrictions, limits on number of pets, and layers of nonrefundable fees and pet rent, a very different picture emerges.
Across the national rental stock:
These gaps have real consequences for both people and animals. More than 80% of dog owners report difficulty securing housing, and many say they've had to move, rehome a pet, hide them, or misclassify them as emotional support animals to stay housed. Academic research on shelter intake confirms that "housing-related" reasons are a major driver of relinquishment, especially for dogs.
For operators, this disconnect represents risk and opportunity. When so many households need homes for their families—including the four-legged members—policies that shut out or heavily penalize pets are increasingly at odds with the market.
The business case for welcoming pets has been remarkably consistent across PIHI's research and independent industry studies:
When you overlay those findings on today's environment of rising vacancies and deeper concessions, the math gets compelling very quickly. Instead of offering a free month to every new lease, operators can:
In other words, pets are not just a "feel-good" amenity—they're a powerful economic stabilizer.
Our friend Jamin Harkness of The Management Group (TMG) in Atlanta, Georgia agrees. TMG instituted pet-inclusive policies (no breed or size restrictions) on all of their properties over five years ago, and haven't looked back. According Jamin, the decision to remain pet-inclusive is continually reinforced – and compelling – for the following reasons:
So why is now the right time to revisit pet policies?
For pet-inclusive housing, this moment is a rare alignment: a softer rental market and a growing evidence base that pets are good for people, communities, and NOI.
Every portfolio is different, but PIHI's work with operators across the country suggests a few high-impact moves:
1. Re-examine breed and weight restrictionsMost "no dogs over 25 pounds" rules are legacy policies, not risk-based decisions. PIHI's research and industry experience show that behavior, individual assessment, and engaged ownership are better predictors of outcomes than size or breed labels.
Consider:
Stacked application fees, nonrefundable pet deposits, and monthly pet rent quickly add up—especially when residents already face steep entry costs.
Options include:
Ambiguity drives anxiety—for residents, staff, and animal-welfare partners.
Treat pet-inclusive changes the way you'd treat any operational initiative:
PIHI's earlier analysis suggests that, for many communities, the financial upside of pets—longer tenancies and faster lease-ups—more than offsets the costs associated with occasional damage or disputes.
As an industry, we have spent the last few years talking about economic occupancy, revenue optimization, and resident experience. Pets sit at the intersection of all three.
In a cooling rental market, every operator is looking for smarter ways to reduce vacancy loss and stand out without racing to the bottom on price. Pet-inclusive housing is one of those rare strategies that:
At the Pet-Inclusive Housing Initiative, we're here to help operators use this moment wisely. The concessions you offer this leasing season will expire after 12 months. The reputation you build as a truly pet-inclusive operator will keep paying dividends—fur and all—for years to come.