Enter your email address for weekly access to top multifamily blogs!

Multifamily Blogs

This is some blog description about this site

Woof v. Yip

Some of us in fair housing circles (yes, there are actually fair housing circles) have been stunned lately about the rash of cases where landlords have not been educated or savvy enough to make reasonable accommodation for service animals.  C’mon folks – get with the program.  It has become a veritable chant of fair housing presenters that “A service animal is not a pet”.  Have all of the pet policies your little (or big) heart desires, but remember that they often and most likely do not apply to a service animal.  And a service animal is either a working animal or one that is referred to as companion animal/ emotional support animal/ comfort animal.


Thinking about and talking about service animals, and particularly dogs, got me thinking back to an article written by the esteemed Mindy Williams, based on research assembled by Rob Foellinger.  This article is now 15 years old; I was able to put my hands on it quickly because I am a mistress of filing and organization (smug moment happening here).  The article has little to do with fair housing, but it shows how sometimes in this business we tend to do things because we have “always done them that way”.


The essence of the article (which was called “Doggone It”) was that veterinarians and dog trainers had been polled and offered their opinion on the top ten breeds that do best in apartments; only one is under 20 pounds.  And the top worst (oxymoron?) ten dogs actually had seven breeds weighing under 20 pounds.  More recently, the Massachusetts Animal Coalition poo-pooed that “small dogs make better apartment dwellers.  Wrong!  Weight and breed have little to do with a dog’s suitability for apartment living.  Small terriers, toy and miniature breeds are often high-strung barkers and chewers.  Toy breeds are frequently harder to housetrain.  Some of the largest dogs are the biggest “couch potatoes”. The MAC also debunked the “Multiple animals should be prohibited” myth as “not necessarily so.  Two’s often company, resulting in less boredom when left home alone, and thus fewer behavior problems—less whining, barking, crying, scratching, destructive chewing, etc.”  


Nonetheless, you can continue to have whatever pet policies you wish.  Just remember that you cannot unreasonably deny requests from those with disabilities to have the service animals they need, even if those animals are not compliant with your pet policies.

Rate this blog entry:

People in this conversation

Leave your comments

  • Nori Goodhue

    It DELIGHTS me to read this article Nan! I work for an apartment association AND I exhibit/handle dogs at dog shows, am VERY active in protecting the rights of dog owners in our state, an active member of several kennel clubs and a proponent for keeping an open mind with regard to dogs in apartments.

    Weight, size and even breed limits make absolutely no sense with regard to allowing or not allowing dogs in apartments. A dog learns the behaviors it is taught (or not taught). A wealth of information on dog related topics can be obtained from the American Kennel Club website - http://www.akc.org

    Additionally, local Kennel clubs that are AKC affiliated are across the nation and available to apartment community representatives to discuss responsible dog ownership, promote resident dog-related seminars and events in apartment communities too! These are great organizations with members that live in the immediate area of their clubs and are highly accessible.

    Thanks for posting this article....it's covers topics close to my heart! Multifamily housing, Fair Housing AND Dogs!!!

    Nori Goodhue

We are taking the alphabet, letter by letter, so perhaps you can do things a little bit better To make your community open to all, and not take an unexpected fair housing fall! And, because Fair Housing covers a lot, we’ve created a resource to print out on the spot!     A is for Animals, and you can say no To my dog, cat, or birdie, unless I can show That this critter is truly needed by me To manage better with my disability. Then dog, cat or birdie is not a pet, S...
Aha!  Now that Christmas carol is an earworm for you!  (Although that was not my true intent for this post.)    Historically I have written about linguistic profiling (when we profile folks not from what we see but by how they sound).  Now it is time to share with you the latest (and for our industry, not-so-greatest) issue of profiling which I saw coming (ahem) – name profiling through email.     A recently published paper (footnote credits at the end o...
Brent has such a kind and gentle way of telling me that the titles for my blogs are really crummy.  He never actually says that, mind you, but I get the message.  So I am really trying this time…   We left off on my last posting (with the exciting title of Neologisms and Fair Housing - Part One – inspired by The Washington Post, which kind of makes me see Brent’s point) discussing additional fair housing protected classes.  So, here we go again… &nbs...