I have to start by giving credit where it's due.
My friend Lisa Trosien has been on a tear lately on LinkedIn—calling out something our industry needs to hear: Just because we can automate something in the leasing journey doesn't mean we should remove the human entirely.
And she's right.
Because while AI is quickly becoming embedded in nearly every step of the renter journey, there's a dangerous narrative creeping in behind it:
If AI can handle it, humans are no longer necessary.
That's not innovation. That's oversimplification.
Let's be clear: AI is not the villain here.
AI-powered chat, automated follow-ups, self-scheduling tours, pricing optimization—these are all powerful tools. They remove friction for operators and create efficiency at scale.
But here's the disconnect:
Efficiency for the operator does not automatically equal a better experience for the renter.
And renters? They're less patient than ever.
We already know the window to convert a prospect has shrunk dramatically. If something doesn't work—or doesn't feel right—they don't wait.
They move on.
The issue isn't AI itself.
It's what happens when AI becomes the only option.
Here are a few examples . . .
1. Self-Guided Tours Without a Safety NetSelf-guided touring is a perfect example.
When it works, it's magic.
When it doesn't?
That moment—right there—is where leasing is either won or lost.
If there's no immediate human fallback, you've just turned convenience into frustration.
And frustration kills leases.
2. AI Follow-Ups That Feel…Off
We've all seen it.
The perfectly structured, overly polished, slightly uncanny AI message that technically says all the right things… but feels like it was written by something that has never leased an apartment.
Renters may not articulate it this way, but they feel it:
And instead of building connection, it creates distance.
Leasing is still a trust exercise.
And trust doesn't come from templated perfection.
3. The "Loop of No Resolution"
This is the one that quietly does the most damage.
A prospect asks a question.
AI responds… partially.
They clarify.
AI responds again… still not quite right.
Now they're stuck in a loop—with no clear path to a human.
At that point, it's not just inefficient.
It's disrespectful of their time.
And again… they move on.
Here's the uncomfortable truth:
The industry is at risk of optimizing for operational efficiency at the expense of customer experience.
And in a market where:
That's a risky trade.
Because renters don't remember how efficient your system was.
They remember how easy—or frustrating—it felt to engage with you.
This isn't an anti-AI argument.
It's a pro-intentionality argument.
The best operators—and the best proptech—will win by doing two things well:
1. Let AI Handle the PredictableInstead of asking:
"How much of the leasing journey can we automate?"
We should be asking:
"Where does the human touch matter most—and are we protecting it?"
Because AI didn't replace leasing professionals.
But poorly designed experiences? Those absolutely can replace your prospects—with someone else's.
Comments